Thursday, December 24, 2015

INTERVIEW ANNIE AND BETH

Linda Montano

LINDA M. MONTANO’S ARCHIVE
Elizabeth Stephens & Annie Sprinkle
Seminal performance artist Linda M. Montano’s archive is for sale. The buyer must insure that her life’s work will be properly preserved so it can be studied and enjoyed by future generations. Several major art institutions have nibbled and it won’t be long before one bites. Take a guided tour of the archive anytime; go to You Tube, search “Linda Mary Montano Archive For Sale.” Linda herself is the tour guide. There are three levels. Level I includes her paper writings, books, reviews and letters. Level 11 includes Level 1 plus her clothing, photo documents, early paintings, and items she used in her every day life, signed as performance art ephemera, as her “life is art.” With Level 111 the archive comes with a two-story building; “The Art/life Institute” in Kingston, New York, an artfully restored bakery, which Linda rebuilt and decorated herself.
At 69 years old, Linda Montano is going strong and her archive continues to grow. During a recent public intervention she spent three days in front of the Empire State Building performing as Mother Teresa of Calcutta where she greeted passers by and spread the love. Montano’s work has always been humanitarian in nature. The sari with the blue trim which she wore, will be added to the archive. These days Montano is a self-described “Catholic Performance Artist,” creating yet another groundbreaking genre of performance art. This is “testimony to my Catholic childhood and need to re-see early roots.”
Montano’s many endurance and durational pieces have strongly influenced contemporary performance art. Her visual art, her teaching, and “life as art” performances have profoundly moved and inspired many. She began doing performance art full time in 1971. Before that she lived in a Roman Catholic convent for two years preparing to be a Maryknoll nun, on a mission to help those in need and “cure leprosy.” When she became severely anorexic she had to leave the convent, and then she discovered that art making was her best medicine for recovery. Thus began her strong connection between art and life, and her conception of “life is art.”
Montano went on to get her MA in sculpture at Villa Schifanoia in Italy, then her MFA at the University of Wisconsin. She lived and worked in San Francisco from 1970 to 1975 and returned often to teach classes and workshops. She lived in a Zen Monastery. Later, she studied for thirty years at the Ananda Ashram with her spiritual teacher, Dr. Ramamurti Mishra. Montano taught performance art at many universities including the San Francisco Art Institute, Bard College, Temple University, Ohio University and University of Texas. Linda Montano has initiated many people into serious art practices and has given permission to others to make art of their life.
A few of Montano’s historic performance pieces are Rope Piece, where she and artist Tehching Hsieh tied themselves together with eight feet of rope between them for one full year during his Art/Life: One Year Performance. They never removed the rope and never touched. She has performed two seven-year-long pieces; 14 Years Of Living Art 1984-1998, where each year of her life was devoted to a different theme and color, and different commitments based on the theology of the seven chakras. During the first seven-year piece, once a month she sat in the window of the New Museum of Contemporary Art in Manhattan, read people’s tarot cards and gave them Art/Life Counseling as art. The lines were continuous and many people reported that the experience changed their lives for the better. Her videos such as Mitchell’s Death and Learning to Talk are part of any respectable history of performance art class and have played in the world’s finest museums and galleries, including the Guggenheim and the Museum of Modern Art. From 1998 To 2005 Montano “experienced” seven years of “Dad Art,” caretaking her sick father who eventually passed away. She states that, “this event was the culmination of my entire practice as an artist.”
Fourteen years ago, Linda Montano put out a public invitation to other artists to utilize her seven-year Living Art performance structure and do their own life’s version of it. This project is titled Another 21 Years of Living Art 1998-2019. Currently 14 other artists are doing her piece incorporating their own unique vision, including an eight-year-old boy in collaboration with his artist mom in Australia. We are fortunate to be part of that group, and the experience has been extraordinary.
ART/LIFE WITH LINDA M. MONTANO
Interview by Elizabeth M. Stephens and Annie M. Sprinkle
Beth: Which do you use, “life as art” or “art as life?” And how did this term get into circulation?
Linda: It is interchangeable and I learned it from Alan Kaprow who studied with Suzuki. I was in San Francisco in the 70’s and was also influenced by Tom Marioni, Terry Fox, Howard Fried, Barbara T. Smith, and Bonnie Sherk who created the FARM. I see ART=LIFE/LIFE=ART as an Asian concept—that the sacredness of life touched everything– that art is indistinguishable from life. That’s why Kaprow along with John Cage and Pauline Oliveros, became enamored of chance operations. They took away the “judging head ” and broke down barriers. Then, moving to San Diego, I continued to be influenced by Pauline and Kaprow and Ellie Antin who taught at UC San Diego as well. Pauline had put her tape recorder on the windowsill and decided to tape everything, listen to everything and compose with that spaciousness….sound=music.
And of course the Women’s Building in Los Angeles, was a giant ART/LIFE experience/experiment.
Beth: So if you think about the work you’ve done and where you have been, what do you think your most important contributions have been to the art world?
Linda: Humor, an ironic twist that pushes things to another level and takes away the kind of seriousness and pomposity that could be a kind of elititism, and birth a world of artists who have gifts and brains that would set them apart from the populous, the people.
Annie: Do you have a favorite work you have produced?
Linda: My favorite “piece” really was taking care of my father. That was a quintessential art life piece. I used my video camera not to make art but to hide behind because of the pain of having to watch him with my own eyes. When I started seeing it as art it was easier to witness, see and transform what was happening. Then later after my Dad died, I made a two-hour movie about him. That was pivotal, because it changed me from what I was before to what I am now. I went back in time, back into my child house, my childhood. Being so near my father, and the intensity of that, I became another person. Humor was my gift in my early work. I see the humor somewhat now, but it’s not a consistent humor. There is something else, and I’m not sure what. Something more real has entered. It’s not that I have given up humor. I just performed as Mother Teresa of Calcutta, which had a twinge of irony because here I am a “dystoniac”(I have cervical dystonia) bent over in spasm, and making believe I’m her. That’s funny, no? There is also something else that is interesting that is happening. In 1970 I sat in front of a video camera for a year and became different characters. Now I’m wanting to become live people. Now I’m wanting to not be make-believe people, but Mother Teresa, Bob Dylan, and Paul McMahon. Before I was Dr. Jane Gooding, and it was fake. Before I was trying to get out of myself and now I’m trying to get nearer to people, to get out of isolation and into intimacy. I will be “you” because I need to share my life. Before it was I’ve gotta get out of my life and be these false people. Also I just finished an essay on this titled “Masks.” See my blog: (HTTP://LINDAMARYMONTANO.BLOGSPOT.COM) I talk about the four levels of consciousness: unconscious, subconscious, conscious and superconscious and I see that I have portrayed all four levels in my persona work: the alcoholic, the professional, the real person(Bob Dylan) and the Guru. It all revolves around accepting all aspects of the self. The neurobiological aspects of rehearsing being another person, changes my brainwaves.
Annie: I adore your humor. Your humor starts in my gut and radiates out my body. It’s not a surface humor that goes inward but a very deep humor that explodes outward. It is spiritually that provides spiritual nourishment.
Linda: Thanks Annie. My grandmother was very funny. She would take her teeth out on holidays and sing. And my mother dressed up on Halloween and went trick or treating.
Beth: My grandmother would take her teeth out too! It was very funny, and very scary. What do you think is the highest form of life-art?
Linda: Anything that creates an ecstasy in the artist; where there is a suspension of time, of judgment. Suspension. There’s a riding the wave of ecstasy when everyone is on the same page. No one is dragging the rudder of judgment or disbelief. It is when the artist is in the state of creation… Or when the artist is co-creating with other ARTISTS/LIFEISTS and they are riding the same train in the same manner and don’t care about time or space. In Catholicism it is called The Mystical Body of Christ. In life, it is ecstasy.
Annie: Are you proud to be an artist?
Linda: I’m very, very happy that I was chosen. I don’t think you choose. The universe chooses people. I am honored to be chosen to be an artist. I don’t think I have anything to do with it.
Beth: What’s the most fun you have had making art?
Linda: I love being different personas, I love being other people. The first time I was Mother Teresa I blew myself away. Me blowing me! And that is so correct because we think… is this blowing the audience away? No, that is the wrong thinking. We have to blow ourselves into ecstasy. When I was studying sculpture in Italy, I dropped the idea of being a studio artist. I collected Italian found objects , audience members picked up an object (according to numbers) which they individually assembled and make a sculpture. That was the beginning of my liberation. Another one happened when my college teacher and mentor, Mother Mary Jane at the College of New Rochelle, gave me “art-wings” and I made a group ceramic mural on a public wall in 1965. Oh yes, freedom for sure.
Annie: You’ve been using recycled materials for a LONG time. Would you say you’ve been in the environmental art movement?
Linda: I think it’s more that I learned thrift, a frugality and a respect for matter from my family. I remember my dad drawing one bowl of water to wash in the morning; everything was done with this one bowl of “sacred” water. Our life was very monastic. My grandmother recycled everything and had a whole album full of condensed milk cows cut from labels. Yeah, recycling is natural to some people because they grew up that way. And then it becomes a movement like Art Povera or Eco-art.
Poverty, war, recessions, depression, a non-consumerist ethos allows for a neo environmental-green that is now au courant.
Beth: Is there such a thing as a failed art project in art/life?
LINDA: We must always think about consequences even though we are these freedom-fighting-geniuses called artists. I would say, as a cautionary word, that the beauty of our calling as artists is to see beyond; we must be the creator, beyond limits, and regulations, and beyond consequences. And yet in the world of reality there ARE consequences. That’s the paradox and makes some of us want to stay in the cave. It takes time and wisdom, and it takes stumblings, and those kinds of haphazard and consequential mistakes to realize that first flush of, oh, I’m going to do this and its going to be fabulous, without thinking of the consequences. Horribleness happens. It is part of the game. But as I age, I can take less and less of it as my stress level seizes me up. Honestly I’m quite content sitting in the kick back chair and watching Entertainment Tonight re-runs. Its good ART/LIFE for me and I am failure-free!!
Beth: So do you think there is such a thing as failure, or is it just part of the process of becoming an artist, and an adult?
Linda: I think that there are no mistakes because there is reality in both. It is “What can I stomach?” I just wrote a “hell” poem inspired from my college days studying the Divine Comedy. My version is composed of layers of hell with exclamations of pain. The poem is titled ENTER (see blog). It is about serial failures and it was so cleansing to write. Failure as art. Exorcising the dark….
Beth: Can you talk about being a Catholic performance artist Linda?
Linda: In these complex times of recessive recessions, downsized possessions, boundaried vacations, medical quarantines, folded funding, foreclosed dreams, I decided or felt called to Become a Catholic Again! It is an exciting return and also has its own challenges. Being a Catholic artist is very new for me, about 10 years old. It came from teaching at the university because there, I had “art children” and I didn’t know how to be an “art mother”. I had been a gig-er before that. I went to gigs in different cities/countries, did my thing and left. No consequences, no muss, no fuss. But teaching for seven years with a group of young people at the same place was a whole other ball game. I had to be a moral compass and protector of their physical/psychological/spiritual safety. Not having had children, I had no idea how to do that so there were times when there were flower-child-art-students, running aesthetically in the halls and a whole lot of performative incredibleness happening that Linda-art loved but Linda-teacher had no idea how to decipher. I went to the Church to get help!
Beth: If you had a young student now that wanted to do life art what advice would you give?
Annie: I’d say ‘call Linda Montano because she’s the best art mother there is.’
Linda: Annie, you are always so generous and supportive of me, and I tear-up with it always… What would I say? Don’t be scared, yet be careful. I’m watching an extremely ill friend who is in her sixties. She had a stroke. Kathy Brew and I were standing next to her bed. She was in critical care. We sang to each other, because we were both feeling the same thing, “What’s it all about Alfie?” And I guess we both agreed that it doesn’t matter how long that resume is when it comes down to the deathbed and final breath. I think I’m coming to that kind of realization which time and age reveal… How to illustrate this? I think when people begin aging and see other people age and when things change so drastically, like my father’s illness, and then returning to Catholicism, having a medical issue where I’m so health focused… I think priorities change.
Can I now be as spicy, and as loyal to the image, to my students, to the video, to the performance, to my brilliance, or to the painting as Georgia O’Keefe was in an interview of her I saw when she was ninety-two. She looked as sharp and committed and focused on being an artist… just like a rattlesnake watching her prey ….and this I could see as she was getting out of her car, going up into the woods on her way to paint New Mexico sunsets. I want to bull dog my way to the end and hang on to the bone of my art and life in a dignified, totally comical, graceful, divinely directed and correct way just like Georgia. Fate might deal me a different strategy. Thanks to my belief-system, it is all, no matter what, wonderful art and a wonderful life.
Beth: Do you think your work is interventionist art? And what do you think that term means?
Linda: There are programs on some of the 400,000 TV programs I watch a week that are about interventions for drugs, alcohol, etc. I think intervention is about: speaking the difficult. Artists really hang out in the difficult, are obliged to communicate the difficult.
Annie: How do you feel like feminism and religion have interacted with your work?
Linda: Feminism is a word that I really don’t apply to myself and I feel really quite inept in this journey I’m on with this Catholic position. Sometimes its working and I’m pretty happy with it and other times not. For example, I go to the jail on Sundays and do a Catholic service there. There is one guard, a man, who likes telling anti-Catholic jokes. There are two other women there and they just listen to the jokes and laugh. They’re more mature than I am. Last time he said he had a new joke. I said, ‘Is it a Catholic joke? Because if it is, I’m leaving.’ And I left. I don’t like the way I did it. I’m proud that I left, but I wish I had done it with more creativity, with humor. With ART! Creativity is the ticket. How to get out of situations or into situations that are more nourishing because I ended up winning in my own eyes, and I don’t want to do that any more. Loving is winning because when l look at a friend on her deathbed…who cares who’s winning. Who cares? There’s just one less person at MY funeral when I’m so intent on winning!
Annie: In terms of your art life practice what are you current commitments/projects now? Didn’t you take a vow to not write for a year?
Linda: The writing commitment is up 2012. It was for seven years. I was going to wear orange forever, and that is getting really mushy. I have a lot of orange clothes but I slip in browns and purples and reds. But as I said before, I’m more focused on compiling, completing, concluding the past, and bringing it into some sort of crescendo/conclusion. That was why I took this no-writing vow. I wanted to cure myself of greedily creating as if I were an art addict and not a lover of truth. Artaholics are not necessary.
Beth: Could you talk about the current group that Annie and I are participating in with you? There are about ten other artists using your Seven Years of Life as Art and seven-chakra structure. Are you glad you made the call for people to join you in using your structure? Is this maybe a strategy for a longer project? What’s it like collaborating with people? What is your response to having this project?
Linda: As far as 21 Years of Living Art is concerned, every 7 years, artists “do their 7 year thing” under the auspices of this school that I founded because I truly love endurance and I wanted to share my love with others. One day I see my thinking about what people are doing in this school as ecumenical-offerings which are not quite Roman Catholic but certainly are spiritual (not religious), and then the next day I want to hide and feel as if I am uncomfortably pushing my boundaries of Catholic belief. Yes, that says it, my boundaries of belief. So right now the school is a wonderful mix of geniuses who are forcing me into deciding whether I’m going to be a fundamentalist finger wagging Catholic church woman via SNL, or if I am there to encourage creativity.
Beth: Here’s a question from our editor, Roxi Hamilton, “How do you feel that ritual and longevity, like 7-year performance cycles, intervene in and shape our conceptions of how art affects life?”
Linda: I want her to answer that one!
Beth: Here’s another one from Roxi., “ How do you regard your extension of ancestry, and that’s borrowing appropriating and extending your 7-year chakra paradigm and whether the 7-year performances should be repeatedly reconceptualized by other artists?”
Linda: I think it’s in the culture anyway. I think that performance art has a way of infecting culture, and then reappearing. It’s already happening, and it’s happened. A lot of it is because the computer has squashed and trumped time, and is preparing us for robotization and intellectual piracy. These attempts of these interventionist artists to speak to, and hold on to time is really an Armageddon-like attempt to point towards a loss via the machine. Endurance is a response to the information age. Endurance is availability. Endurance is staying the course. Endurance gives us a taste of solidity that is being lost to floating avatarily in SECOND LIFE.
Beth: One more question from Roxi. “Your personal spiritual, and artistic vocabulary seems to be composed of a hybrid of mostly Catholic but also Indian influences, the guru, the chakras, etc. Can you comment on the significance of combining your own childhood religion with the language and practice of other cultures?”
Linda: It can only be a richer meal.
Beth: Anything else you would like to say?
Linda: Buy my archive so I can simplify. lindamontano@hotmail.com See it on You Tube. Its called “Archive for Sale.” I’m giving a finder’s fee for the best price.
Annie: Who would the ideal buyer be?
Linda: The Getty, NYU, Bard, An International Institute? See Part 4 of the video and find a place. Fast. Anywhere that the Archive can be used for research would be good. I’m really putting effort into putting my papers, books, videos and objects in order. I’m becoming an archivist. Does that mean I’m now a librarian? Not another persona, please! The best scenario is if somebody bought the Kingston “Art/Life Institute” and kept the archive there and used it as a study center, a performance center. That would be perfect!
Annie: I’d give anything to see that happen.
Beth: That’s really exciting.
Linda: ART LIVES!!!!!!!!!!
We highly encourage you to contact Linda Mary Montano for Art/Life/Laughter Counseling. Or gather her unique wisdom from her three books: Art In Everyday Life, Performance Artists Speaking In the 80’s, Letters from Linda M. Montano. Invite her to do lectures, workshops, and performances in your city. Visit her web site at lindmontano.com. If you are interested in acquiring her amazing archive, contact her at lindamontano@hotmail.com. Buy it and donate it to NYU or find a rich uncle who needs a tax write off and let him buy it, then donate it to NYU. Your finder’s fee is a day tied to Linda with love.    
Follow Us:Subscribe via Google+

THE GLANDS AND CHAKRAS ARE GRATEFUL TO ANNIE AND BETH

 THE GLANDS AND CHAKRAS ARE GRATEFUL TO ANNIE AND BETH:
 
1. CHAKRA 1: MULADHARA. GLAND 1: OVARIES/TESTES. INTIMACY. ANNIE & BETH: Gratitude to you both! There are now 455,072,324 young, old, straight, bi, transgender and celibate folks who comfortably and  ecstatically celebrate their sensuality because of you and in doing so they generate more love for this hungry/hurting planet.
 
2. CHAKRA 2: SVADHISTHANA. GLAND 2: PANCREAS. MONEY. BETH & ANNIE: Gratitude to you both! As penultimate earth stewards you both fearlessly generate props, costumes, magical objects and millions of glittery accoutrements which transform environments and with gusto and without shyness, you seek funding to finance these spectacles that ritually/positively change group consciousness.
 
3. CHAKRA 3: MANIPURA. GLAND 3: ADRENALS. COURAGE. ANNIE & BETH: Gratitude to you both! Prophets have no limits and your aesthetic message that everyone and everything has a soul has allowed you to fearlessly, courageously and radically do everything possible to protect all souls.
 
4. CHAKRA 4: ANAHATA. GLAND 4: THYMUS. LOVE. BETH & ANNIE: Gratitude to you both! You have performed enough autobiographical work so that you both feel healed enough to become  BIGGER than your individual selves and now you can focus on the earth as a living, organic being in need of attention, transformation and performative respect.
 
5. CHAKRA 5: VISHUDDHA. GLAND 5: THYROID. COMMUNICATION. ANNIE & BETH: Gratitude to you both! You walk your talk in simple inclusivity. It is obvious that both of you are secret, private, hidden intellectuals who easily speak the language of the academy, but you both insist on connecting/speaking with and not AT all so that the message and people benefit. What a wonderful strategy for ACTIVISTIS of LOVE who side-step away from power and fame so that the earth/others can shine.
 
6. CHAKRA 6: AJNA. GLAND 6: PINEAL: INTUITION. BETH & ANNIE: Gratitude to you both!  You see what needs to be done and seed your vision to pioneer a path that will positively change the ENTIRE universe.
 
7. CHAKRA 7: SAHASRARA. GLAND 7: PITUITARY. JOY. ANNIE & BETH. Gratitude to you both! Keep leading us into the waters so we splash around again like we did before. Keep leading us to non-judgmental collaborations. Keep leading us to the information that opens our minds to the real truth. Keep leading us to healthy ways to convert pain/evil/distress into fabulous flowers of beauty and light. Keep leading us back to the GARDEN.
 
Linda Mary Montano, Saugerties  2015.
 
 
           



--

THE STORY OF ARE YOU WELL


THE STORY OF "ARE YOU WELL?" Linda Mary Montano, Saugerties NY, 2015


I preach art is life and life is art and a few years ago I actually practiced it. Here is how my attempt to eliminate the boundaries between the two imploded on me, exposing and exploring my theory . Notice how I didn't really pass the art/life test of seamless, pleasant, transparent union of the two. Here is the story: One afternoon I was standing on the front of the line at the Port of Authority, NYC, waiting to board the NY to Kingston Adirondack Trailways bus. Usually people are still in city mode and keep to themselves unless they have to go to the bathroom and then they might break silence and ask the person in front or back of them to watch their stuff. So when I heard a voice from way in back  call out in a friendly and cute way, "Hello Linda, are you well?" I bolted, blanched, bleated and barfed a spontaneous spoken word intervention and answer from deep in my bowels and in not so good  performance artist in action fashion, literally sounded, shouted and not so happily addressed the question with the following rude answer to the said female actress I hardly knew. It went like this: "Am I well? Am I well. What do you mean am I well.  I have alzheimers (a fear); dementia (a fear); leaky gut (a fear); urinary incontinence (a fear)."  And maybe I said more. I don't remember. And then I said,  "Shelly, are you well?" I  am forgetting what happened next because it was all so traumatic, the appearance of my performance artist persona off the stage, that is. And what is notable is that it was dementia-like of me to respond that way which totally complicates the entire scenario. Fabulous art/not so fabulous life.

Stuffing the event deep into my unanalyzed and therapeutically untreated back brain, it recently got triggered again. You see,  Shelly was a few years ahead of herself using the are you well greeting because NOW, everybody is saying it or emailing their endings, "Be well. Or, hope you are well." I'm obviously not over the big, pulsing need to correct them when they say the "well" stuff but  the worst part is that the performance artist is over it, but Linda the non performance artist is addressing the situation in a way that is completely embarrassing and out of order. The wreckage is  much more personally damaging than my Port of authority slippage because NOW, I'm  correcting friends, acquaintances and non-friends when the words are heard in my presence or written in emails. And it is not pretty. I don't know Linda the corrector as well as I do, Linda the performer and as an uncertified stop-wellness officer, I am becoming scary to myself and a persona non grata to those who might want to say Hi to me but are afraid that I might bark a correction.
And by the way Shelly, if I ever see you again, I will say, " Remember that day at the Port of Authority? I'm SO sorry. I was wrong, wrong, wrong!"
  This is not good and it is taking me soon, I promise, to a therapist who I hope will help me trace the trigger to the source. Ooopps, trigger is a bad word too!! But meanwhile, (notice the word mean), I went to my Facebook community and email community and  posed the question.

I am collecting 1-2 sentence responses that you FB me to my question, "Why r people saying "ARE U WELL when they greet each other?" And why do they end emails, "Be well. Hope you are well!!" Will include  your responses in an essay. Thanks, Linda
Here are their answers:

SUZANNE HELLMUTH: Well,well,well I had to find the entomology. The word comes from Latin vele to wish, & earlier proto-Indo-European that evolved to Germanic, old English, Welsh having double meanings of good/fair/kind/health & related meanings to that group AND drawing/springing forth as water from a spring... tears from the eyes.
    Would a spring or well of water be good as in a fulfillment of wish --thus a water source or a well --& that water-wish word came to also mean for good/fair/kind/healthy...?  Or, having water...is well, is source of well-being-- ?  Etc. 
English have towns with Wells in their name for example, Turndote Wells, where there are natural springs. Wellington, etc.
   But, really, what is wellness now? 
 
 
Margarat Nee I blame Garrison Keillor for "be well" because he closes his poetry segments on the radio with it. I've never been greeted with "are you well" but it seems like a very clunky substitute for the usual "how's it goin" "how ya doin'" etc.

(My complaint is that people shouldn't open with that unless they really want to know, otherwise dopes like me forget sometimes and answer the question)

 
Mary Disney good ? I wonder if people are trying to shorten their correspondence and at the same time heighten their meaning with the CAPS. I think people are saying in the emails when they sign off is that they hope their friend is doing all they can to be well. I often end my emails with "Bee well" because I am a beekeeper.
 

 
Abina Manning When I moved to the U.S. and people would ask me "Are you well?" I would answer them. Until I saw their eyes glaze over. smile emoticon.

 
Margarat Nee When I was in Ireland it took me awhile to understand that when when folks behind a shop/cafe counter asked "are you ok?" they meant did I want to buy/order something from them.
 
CAROL SACHAL  I learned a long time ago, 50 years or more, NEVER to ask my Ukrainian Grandmother, Nanny, "How are you?" when I went to visit her each week, 3 times a week as required in my family.  The reason:  she would tell me:  "This hoits, that hoits, oh my, the pain!"  (hoits=hurts)   If I didn't ask her, she wouldn't tell me and it was a much more uplifting visit, so I learned to not ask that question.

 


Linda Mary Montano im learning alot keep them coming.

 
Eileen Kane Here in Tucson, where lots of my neighbors are elderly, we don't ever ask that question!

 
Victoria Singh In New Zealand people tend to say "howzit goin?" no equivalent to "be well" springs to mind

 

 
Mary Puddycat Collins My friends and I started closing our letters with the Latin "Vale" - be well - that we learned in high school.

 Tobe Carey  Well...or when I ask my "older" friend how he is, he always answers, "Rotting away, thanks."
 
Paul W McMahon Humans need water to survive, even more than food but not air. so if you are well, you are also well and water of life flow thru you. if you are not a well you may be getting swampy so dig deeper in order to be well again! it's meta 4 4 minstrel psychical. i never met a 4 i didn't like.
 
Gene Loeb (Shinananda)  I think when they ask " Are you well, " they are asking u to say to yourself, "Why, do I look like shit?"
 
Lizbeth Rymland   ( I cant find her response but I remember she said something like, forget it when it happens or maybe she was saying , it isn't worth the energy, getting upset about someone saying, "ARE YOU WELL?"


RICH BRANDES: Research reveals that travelers in Merry Olde England visiting pubs and taverns in unfamiliar villages might ask an establishment if they served a favorite dish known as Beef Wellington.  The question “Are you serving any Beef Wellington?” was shortened to “Are You Beef Wellington?” and later to simply “Are You Well ington?” 
As meat eating has become less popular the phrase “Are you well” has fallen out of favor.
 
CONCLUSION: Thanks to all of the participants, I'm cooled down. I promise I will never correct WELL again when it is said or written because I have found the source of my trigger in Eileen Kane's response:  "Here in Tucson, where lots of my neighbors are elderly, we don't ever ask that question!"
And by the way Shelly, if I ever see you again, I will say, " Remember that day at the Port of Authority? I'm SO sorry. I was wrong, wrong, wrong!"
 
 Be,
Linda

DAD ART - PERFORMANCE

 
                                                                DAD ART  PERFORMANCE
 
                                                 A  THREE HOUR COLLAGUED/INTERACTIVE 
                                                                        
                                                    MEDITATION ON LIFE AND DEATH
                                                             LINDA  MARY MONTANO
 
 
STATEMENT: In 1998, I began a video collaboration with my father, Henry Montano. After his stroke, I continued documenting us.
 
This collagued and  interactive experience, DAD ART, is an opportunity for those present to bring creative attention via video/performance/dialogue to the Great Matter, Death.
 
 
COMPONENTS:
 
1.  A full screen video projection of DAD ART, DVD. Length, two hours.
 
2. Montano, singing a song from the 40's, every 20 minutes.
 
3.  A Master of Ceremonies who invites audience members' participation and articulates shamanically , the feeling of the performance.
 
4. Three interactive actions, collaged into the performance and happening simultaneously:
 
      A. An artist/lifeist, sitting at a table, onstage,  handing out glasses of water to audience members who come onstage to receive water.
 
      B. An artist/lifeist, sitting at a table, onstage, writing the spoken words of audience members who dictate a letter to death.
 
      C. One or two artists/lifeists, sitting on a chair onstage,  talking with an audience member about death.
 
 5.  At the end  of the performance,  artists/lifeists from the community will process into the performance space , with sounds, flags, ceremony and will gather the letters to death. They will then lead the audience to an appropriate space outside or inside where the letters will be burned.
 
6. Questions and answers.
 
TECHNOLOGY:
 
1. Video-Sound projector for DVD.
 
2. Mixer, speakers, playback, wireless microphone for  Master of Ceremonies, wireless microphone for Montano. And all other sound equipment as needed. Microphone for musician when present.
 
3. Cd player with auto pause.
 
4. Lights and colored gels for the 3 interactive action sites, Light for the  Master of Ceremonies and light for Montano. 
 And other lighting as needed.
 
BUDGET:
 
1. Transportation for Montano. Per diem. Lodging. Honorarium. Same for Musician when present.
 
2. Video rental.
 
3. Honorarium for performers.
 
CONTACT:
 
 
845-399 -2502,  9-5PM
 
 
LINDAMARYMONTANO.BLOGSPOT.COM
 
 SEVEN SONGS  SUNG THROUGHOUT THE PERFORMANCE:  WITH DVD OR MUSICIAN PRESENT
1. MY FUNNY VALENTINE  A MINOR C FLAT
2. TIME ON MY HANDS  B  FLAT
3. DANCING IN THE DARK   A
4. IM IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE  A
5. IVE GOT YOU UNDER MY SKIN B FLAT
6. I'LL BE SEEING YOU  F
7. THE MAN I LOVE   G
7 SONGS ABOUT THE GLANDS, KEY OF  C

FACEBOOK ALIASES

 FACEBOOK AIIASES
 
 ARE YOU ADDICTED TO FACEBOOK?
 GO ON FOR MORE THAN 3 HOURS A DAY?
 CANT WAIT TO CHECK YOUR LIKES AND COMMENTS?
 CHECK CONSTANTLY TO SEE IF YOUR BEST FRIEND LIKES OR COMPLAINS ABOUT YOUR FABULOUS POSTS?
 DO YOU PLAY EVERY GAME SUGGESTED?
 FIND YOUR NAME TRANSLATED  IN ANCIENT LANGUAGES?
 HAVE YOU FOUND WHAT THEY SAY IS YOUR FAVORITE COLOR?
 DO U KNOW WHO YOUR FACEBOOK SOULMATE IS?
 DO PICTURES OF YOU LOOKING TERRIBLE GARNER COMPLIMEMTS LIKE:  "LIKE", "YOU LOOK FABULOUS" , "HAVENT SEEN YOU LOOKING BETTER"  FROM YOUR "FRIENDS"?
 DOES FACEBOOK HIDE POSTS FROM PEOPLE YOU REALLY WANT TO HEAR FROM AND HAS THIS STOPPED BOTHERING YOU?
 ARE YOU GETTING PHONE CALLS FROM COMPANIES THAT HAVE TRACED YOUR EXISTENCE FROM YOUR FACEBOOK "LIFE"?
 STOP!!!!!!!!!
 THERE IS A WAY OUT:
 MEDIA DOCTOR LINDA MARY MONTANO AND MEDIA DOCTOR TOBE CAREY CAN FIX THIS FOR YOU.
 YOU MAY ASK, "HOW"?
 HERE IS HOW!
 1.  EVERYDAY, SEND  POSTS TO US THAT SAY WHAT YOU  WANT TO SAY ON FACEBOOK.
 2. PAYPALL US $77.70 A LETTER SO, FOR EXAMPLE IF THE WORD YOU WANT TO SAY ALOT  IS  "LIKE", THEN SEND US ; $310.80,  FOR ONE USE OF THE WORD,"LIKE"  AND IF PERCHANCE YOU WANT TO USE THAT WORD 10 TIMES IN ONE MORNING, THEN SEND US  $310.80 TIMES  10. 
 3. IF YOU WANT US TO GO BACK ONLINE IN THE AFTERNOON OR EVENING, THEN IMAGINE WHAT YOU  MIGHT WANT TO SAY OR ELSE WE WILL SAY WHAT WE THINK YOU WOULD SAY AND WE WILL SEND OUR BILL VIA PAYPALL TO YOU.
 
OUR COMPANY FACEBOOK ALIASES THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS AND IF YOU WANT  TO BEGIN THIS PROCESS, THEN PM US VIA OUR FACEBOOK "MESSAGE." 
 
ENJOY YOUR FACE TO FACE  TIME AWAY,
 
LIKE US,
 
LINDA AND TOBE

ANN MCCOY ARTICLE FROM BROOKLYN RAIL

Eating Apollo’s Cattle

Hermes is a cattle thief, messenger, trickster, boundary crosser, and a god who represents a lot of artists. Fresh from the womb he steals Apollo’s sacred cattle, and with cunning covers his tracks by walking backwards. Apollo is the god of the establishment, of architecture, the plastic arts, and the sublime. Transgression always has to do with acts against the establishment, be it Olympus or the old guard. Hermes also steals the fire, as precocious upstarts are likely to do. Some Minimalist artists were upset when Julian Schnabel’s broken plates shattered their dreams of a lasting Minimalist reign. Filippo Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto represents the extreme with his loathing and destruction of old political and artistic traditions—let’s toss Raphaels into the canal to make way for the new. Without transgression there is no movement, entrenched ideas stay entrenched. In his alchemical form Hermes-Mercury is quicksilver; the god of uncontrollable movement, unpredictable and impossible to pin down.
GALI TIBBON/AFP/Getty Images
Hermes steals the fire sticks and Apollo’s sacred cattle, and then invents a way to cook the meat for consumption. Greedy Hermes saves the best fatty meat for himself, and gives bones wrapped up in hide to the other gods, defiling the sacred for personal gain and passing off the inedible. Today, a lot of transgression has become about eating the fat of the sacred cattle for quick fame and art market lucre. Ever since Charles Saatchi cashed in on Sensation, we’ve known that transgression sells. Transgressive art, some well conceived and some boringly puerile, has become a strategy. You get the most attention by trashing Christianity; the Jews and Muslims don’t put up with it and you risk an Anti-Defamation League lawsuit or a fatwa. In many cases, the underlying motivation seems more about narcissism, the opposite of reflection. Transgression as an art idea is becoming shop-worn; we need artistic creation that is positive and transformational. Where is the artist as light bringer in these dark times?
Why did I refuse to support Free Pussy Riot? As someone who has railed against Popes, is a feminist, and had a gay Jewish cannibal teaching my art history class, I should have. Their trial smacked of Stalinist-era repression. I am not a fan of Putin, and would have joined the chain of protesters encircling Moscow. I don’t fancy the carwash beneath Moscow’s rebuilt Christ the Savior, or the current Patriarch’s gifted Rolex and support for Putin. Many Russian Orthodox followers do not support Putin or the views of Patriarch Kirill. If Pussy Riot had protested in Putin’s office, it would have been fine. For me, it comes down to defiling the sacred. They performed in front of the iconostasis or templon (a wall dividing the altar from the sanctuary probably derived from the Torah screen), a link between heaven and the nave. To defile any temenos precinct—be it Christian, Buddhist, Jewish, or Muslim—is not okay. To cut down a sacred grove in the ancient world was punishable by death.
First there is the history: between 40 and 60 million Orthodox Christians died in the gulags, including most of the clergy, the biggest martyrdom of Christians in history. The Bolsheviks dynamited Christ the Savior to the ground. For Orthodox Christians this was like the Taliban blowing up ancient statues of Buddha. It was rebuilt after Glasnost by donations from ordinary people as a sign of resurrection and hope. Pussy Riot’s choice of this venue was distasteful, and made many “old believers” hearts sink. Their sentence was harsh, but not as harsh as Pavel Florensky’s. The Russian Da Vinci, priest, scientist, and aesthetician got a bullet in the back of the head in 1937, after 10 years in the Gulag. Maria Alyokhina—who was allowed to watch videos in her Berezniki Prison cell—complained when the authorities confiscated a film by Jean-Luc Godard because it contained nudity. Paval Florensky worked on scientific experiments during his 10-year imprisonment. When his body was carried out, his fellow inmates risked death to kneel. Maria Alyokhina’s complaints seemed trivial in comparison. Heroism is not what it used to be.
Trashing Christian beliefs has become a tired strategy. It is an extension of academic preaching that began with the Frankfurt School. According to their Inquisition, all religion—especially Catholicism—is bad. Their reductive argument for the atomization of religion goes roughly like this: because Hitler was an altar boy all religion leads to National Socialism, is the product of authoritarian fathers, and is the height of bourgeois consciousness. Atheism has been the party line since the 1940s. Much of the theoretical art history establishment places any believer, especially Christians, in the same debunked category as Russian babushkas, naïve Hispanics, and the Christian right. The sure-fire extension of this is to link the scatological with the Christian.
“Shit, shit, the Lord's shit!
Shit, shit, the Lord's shit! (Chorus) Virgin Mary, Mother of God, become a feminist. Become a feminist, become a feminist
 shit in the holy of holies.” (Pussy Riot)

That some artists have complex systems of belief (read Teilhard de Chardin) have a Buddhist practice, are Goddess worshipers, or attend shul is never mentioned. Thousands of years of Christian scholarship is dismissed with a wave of the hand as bunk. Linda Montano speaking about Catholic confession and art practice doesn’t fit into the dialectic. Joseph Beuys’s conversations with the priest Volker Harlan can make them foam at the mouth. Eleanor Heartney’s Catholics “run amock” are all right, as long as the prefix “ex” is stressed, and the work is transgressive or involves carnality. Hermann Nitsch is an Actionist, but his well-developed ideas about reviving spirituality by reintroducing the vitality of paganism and the Taurobolium are ignored.
The sacred is needed, now more than ever. It connects art to something greater than ourselves and is the opposite of narcissism. We are living in an era that lacks rituals for transformation. The senior prom is trivial compared to Apache girls anointed with pollen and dancing through a symbolic creation myth for four days. When Wolfgang Laib brought a group of Hindu fire priests to Fondazione Merz in Torino he was suggesting what art needs to do again. Like the Apache maiden ceremony, the Hindu fire ritual is a recreation of a cosmology, performed to bring us in line with the universe. Donna Henes’s rituals do not get a lot of airtime, and she is marginalized and relegated to history of the 1960s along with a host of other feminists. A.A. Bronson, with his healing rituals and degree from Union Theological Seminary, is reviving spiritual practice in the gay community.

One recent night in May was Russian Easter. I attended a service at the Holy Virgin of Protection Cathedral, which was filled with beeswax candles and 400 people. The three hour mass was attended by artists, Columbia Ph.D. students, young mothers, Orthodox converts, Japanese, a Chinese film crew, a Franciscan, and several Russian Jews. The service’s liturgy goes back to 358 A.D. First the church was dark; this represented the time after Christ was taken down from the cross. An icon of the crucified Christ was carried to the altar behind the doors of the iconostasis, representing Christ in the tomb. Midway through the service the area behind the iconostasis lit up, the doors opened, and a priest emerged with a torch proclaiming Christ has risen. Congregants lit their candle from the torch and began a processional around the East Village. Ancient rituals such as this one with dadouchos (torch bearers) are part of many mystery religions, Eleusinian, Mithraic, and Orphic. Osiris was the god of grain, “reborn” yearly with the crops. The Egyptians were one of many cultures with rituals of agricultural renewal; they planted seeds in a mud form of Osiris and placed the plants in their tombs. Polish artist Teresa Murak does something similar today with church runners and garments of lady’s mock, a Polish Easter plant.

Faith is complex. It still transforms lives and still motivates worshipers, including artists. Artists like Mel Chin and Aviva Rahmani are working on ecological reclamation, a much needed topic. Chin’s mandalah shaped reclamation plots reference the cosmos and Self. Rahmani applies her research to develop “Trigger Point Theory as Aesthetic Activism,” to degraded landscapes, a strategy to affect environmental justice and fix the world (tikkun). The tricky part is bringing these ideas into the collective. Today the most transgressive move would be to bring the sacred back into art. Quicksilver Hermes could slip this idea past the theoretical lock down in art departments, editorial offices, and curatorial programs.

Contributor

Ann McCoy
ANN MCCOY is an artist and writer who lectures in the Yale School of Drama.

LINDA AND TOBE VIDEO SONG

LINDA AND TOBE VIDEO SONG
 
 
WE LOVE VIDEO
 
OUR VIDEOS ARE COOL TO MAKE
 
FACES SCROLL AND SOMETIMES SHAKE
 
FOR 20 YEARS WE CRANKED THEM OUT
 
AND HONESTLY WITHOUT A DOUBT
 
IT'S BEEN A DANCE OF JOY SO SWEET
 
CREATING FUN IS SUCH A TREAT
 
SUCH A TREAT
 
SUCH A TREAT
 
Linda Mary Montano 2015